MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294730956 · doi:10.1353/ail.2022.0012

Apprenticeship Pedagogy for Teaching Indigenous Popular Literary and Multi-Media Genres

2022· article· en· W4294730956 on OpenAlex
Brenda Carr Vellino

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in American Indian Literatures · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousDramaApprenticeshipSociologyTraditional knowledgeSubject (documents)HistoryMedia studiesPedagogyLiteratureArtArchaeologyEcologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apprenticeship Pedagogy for Teaching Indigenous Popular Literary and Multi-Media Genres Brenda Vellino (bio) As I am writing this chapter on unceded Algonquin Anishinaabe territory in the Kiji Sibi (Ottawa River) watershed of northern Turtle Island, I am teaching an Indigenous drama course to fifteen students on Zoom. Recent encounters with teachings from Algonquin Anishnaabe educators, scholars, and performance practitioners are rearranging my learning and teaching practices.1 These will indelibly shape how I teach my next offering of a seminar in Indigenous Popular Literary and Multi-Media Genres, the subject of this essay. The teaching story I offer here is thus a continual work in progress, changing even as I teach and write in this semester. I was raised in settler culture without knowing that an ethical existence depends upon respecting the Indigenous territories I was living in. I also passed decades of my life before learning what John Borrows, Aaron Mills, Zoe Todd, and Anna Kanngieser have taught us: that stories arising from these lands and waters teach kinship relations principles and responsibilities for the humans and more-than-human beings dwelling there. Although I was in high school more than forty years ago, this is still true for those settler students present in many of our Indigenous literatures classrooms. Learning more about how to learn beyond the simple fact of a land acknowledgment has rearranged my brain, just as rethinking my address from the point of view of being a citizen of the Kiji Sibi watershed has done.2 An ongoing practice of decolonial land and territories apprenticeship-based learning informs how I encourage diverse student engagement in my Indigenous Popular Literary and Multi-Media Genres course.3 While key discussions of Indigenous literary pedagogy are foundational,4 my thinking draws particularly on multidisciplinary [End Page 163] Indigenous perspectives with pedagogical implications. An Indigenous literatures course can be productively informed by Indigenous-led conversations from performative storywork methodologies, legal studies, and decolonial place-based studies. The confluence of these overlapping areas is an informing matrix for the development of this course. Key emergent contexts for my teaching include storywork priorities as theorized by Jo-Ann Archibald (Stó:lō) and Brunette-Debissage (Mushkego Cree iskwew/French) and Pauline Wakeham for engaging Indigenous literary studies from the perspective of relational respect and responsibility. John Borrows (Chippewas of Nawash) and Aaron Mills (Anishinabe) further emphasize the ways that oral stories carry legal principles governing responsible relations between all elements of the multispecies world. This is augmented by experiential learning practices that pay careful attention to decolonial land and territory positioning where land is not taken up solely as an abstract literary theme, setting, or metaphor (Tuck and McKenzie, 134, 148). To have an inkling of how to engage with relational kinship priorities manifest in the "animacy" of land, plants, trees, and beings in oral, written, and performance texts (Watts; Todd and Kanngieser; Cariou), it is important to have a tangible sense of the lands and waters where one resides and the laws arising from them. Anishinaabe legal scholar Aaron Mills advocates for settlers to "respect and live by" Indigenous laws arising from the territories where one lives: "to understand that you are … always in relationship with everybody there, including all those non-humans who fly, walk, crawl, swim, reach, and rumble" (20–24). His call to "do much more than simply make space for our voices," invites reflection on what it might mean for instructors and students to live in a way that reflects principles of territorial Indigenous laws. What might it mean to read and respond to texts from this perspective? This question can be productively applied to engagement with all forms of literary, visual, and performative storywork, augmented by attention to performance studies priorities for embodied and multi-sensory engagement (Archibald-Barber, Ravensbergen, Lachance). My apprenticeship journey began and continues through experiential learning from diverse Indigenous knowledge holders, educators, and artists at public gatherings like the CACLALS Aboriginal Round Tables (http://caclals.ca/about-us/), community events, lectures, art shows, and performances. Informed by these, I began to teach selected Indigenous [End Page 164] fiction, poetry, and drama as key texts in a Canadian literature survey course, oriented...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0110.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it