Prediction of disease progression indicators in prostate cancer patients receiving HDR-brachytherapy using Raman spectroscopy and semi-supervised learning: a pilot study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work combines Raman spectroscopy (RS) with supervised learning methods-group and basis restricted non-negative matrix factorisation (GBR-NMF) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA)-to aid in the prediction of clinical indicators of disease progression in a cohort of 9 patients receiving high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as the primary treatment for intermediate risk (D'Amico) prostate adenocarcinoma. The combination of Raman spectroscopy and GBR-NMF-sparseLDA modelling allowed for the prediction of the following clinical information; Gleason score, cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA) score of pre-treatment biopsies and a Ki67 score of < 3.5% or > 3.5% in post treatment biopsies. The three clinical indicators of disease progression investigated in this study were predicted using a single set of Raman spectral data acquired from each individual biopsy, obtained pre HDR-BT treatment. This work highlights the potential of RS, combined with supervised learning, as a tool for the prediction of multiple types of clinically relevant information to be acquired simultaneously using pre-treatment biopsies, therefore opening up the potential for avoiding the need for multiple immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining procedures (H&E, Ki67) and blood sample analysis (PSA) to aid in CAPRA scoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".