MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294755066 · doi:10.15273/10222/81965

Individual Perspectives on Data Sharing: Human Factors Impacting the Digital Economy

2022· report· en· W4294755066 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Smit, Cassandra Larose, Connor Falvey, Shayla Fitzsimmons, Christina MacDonald

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCompetitive and Knowledge Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierResearch councilGovernment (linguistics)Context (archaeology)Library scienceData sharingPolitical scienceEconomyGeographyComputer scienceEconomicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the final report for the SSHRC Knowledge Synthesis Grant of the same name. This report is co-funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and the Government of Canada’s Future Skills program. We gratefully acknowledge the support of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, MEOPAR NCE, Tula Foundation, and the Ocean Frontier Institute in providing the context and opportunity for CIOOS Atlantic to thoughtfully consider data sharing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0180.011
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCompetitive and Knowledge IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207