MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294792489 · doi:10.1007/s12975-022-01072-x

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Ten Years of Lessons Learned and Adjustments in Practice from the WorldWideWEB Consortium

2022· article· en· W4294792489 on OpenAlexaff
Adam A. Dmytriw, Mahmoud Dibas, Sherief Ghozy, Nimer Adeeb, Jose Danilo Bengzon Diestro, Kevin Phan, Hugo Cuellar, Ahmad Sweid, Sovann V. Lay, Adrien Guenego, Leonardo Renieri, Ali Al Balushi, Guillaume Saliou, Markus Möhlenbruch, Robert W. Regenhardt, Justin E. Vranic, Iván Lylyk, Paul M. Foreman, Jay A. Vachhani, Vedran Župančić, Muhammad Ubaid Hafeez, Caleb Rutledge, Muhammad Waqas, Vincent M. Tutino, James D. Rabinov, Yifan Ren, Clemens M. Schirmer, Mariangela Piano, Anna Luisa Kühn, Caterina Michelozzi, Stéphanie Elens, Robert M. Starke, Ameer E Hassan, Arsalaan Salehani, Peter B. Sporns, Jesse Jones, Marios Psychogios, Julian Spears, Boris Lubicz, Pietro Panni, Ajit S Puri, Guglielmo Pero, Christoph J. Griessenauer, Hamed Asadi, Christopher J. Stapleton, Adnan H. Siddiqui, Andrew F. Ducruet, Felipe C. Albuquerque, Rose Du, Peter Kan, Vladimir Kalousek, Pedro Lylyk, Srikanth Boddu, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, Jared Knopman, Mohammad Ali Aziz‐Sultan, Nicola Limbucci, Pascal Jabbour, Christophe Cognard, Aman B. Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Stroke Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of TorontoLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAneurysmNeurosurgeryNeuroradiologyInterventional radiologyEndovascular treatmentEmbolizationNeurologyRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTranslational Stroke ResearchSame topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207