MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Associations Between Obesity, Rural-Urban Continuum Codes, And Physical Activity Program Preferences Among Breast Cancer Survivors

2022· article· en· W4294798385 on OpenAlexaff
Nashira I. Brown, Edward McAuley, Kerry S. Courneya, Phillip Anton, Diane K. Ehlers, Siobhan M. Phillips, Erica Schleicher, Dori Pekmezi, Laura Q. Rogers

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObesityPopulationBreast cancerHealth promotionBody mass indexPhysical therapyClubGerontologyAerobic exerciseCancerPublic healthEnvironmental healthNursingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Many cancer survivors in rural areas with obesity fail to meet the American College of Sports Medicine physical activity (PA) guidelines. PA promotion programs are needed for these populations. This study examined the associations between obesity, rural-urban continuum (RUCC) codes, and PA program preferences. METHODS: Physically inactive breast cancer survivors (N=222) completed the baseline assessment for a randomized controlled PA trial including surveys to assess PA program preferences (i.e., location, exercise counseling source, exercise counseling delivery, exercise type [walking vs yoga], program type [aerobic vs resistance training], supervised vs unsupervised exercise, individual vs group exercise, flexible vs scheduled, amount willing to pay for exercise program, distance willing to travel, and distance willing to travel if gas costs were covered). Chi-Square analyses using dichotomized variables were conducted. Obesity was defined as body mass index ≥ 30. RUCC codes were classified as metro [RUCC=1 and3] vs non-metro [RUCC=6]. RESULTS: Participants were primarily white (85%), non-Hispanic (98%), and employed (71%) with an average age of 54.4 ± 8.5 years; half (51%) were obese. Most resided in metro areas with <250,000 population (RUCC=3; 73.6%) while the remaining resided in metro areas with >1 million population (RUCC=1; 22%) or nonmetro with 2,500-19,999 population (RUCC=6, 5%). When compared with non-obese, survivors with obesity were more likely to prefer exercise counseling from a personal trainer rather than a cancer exercise specialist, health club exercise specialist, or other cancer survivor (44% of non-obese vs. 57% of obese, p=.03). RUCC was associated with the farthest distance willing to travel (≥16 miles acceptable to 95% of RUCC 1 and 3 vs. 5% of RUCC 6, p<.001) and farthest distance willing to travel if gas costs were covered (≥16 miles acceptable to 42% of RUCC 1 and 3 vs 4% of RUCC 6, p=.027). No other preferences were associated with obesity or RUCC. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise counseling source and distance traveled are preferences associated with obesity or metro vs. nonmetro residency. Future PA programs should consider these factors along with potential reach and access concerns when targeting breast cancer survivors with obesity or living in nonmetro areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCancer survivorship and care→French-language works237,207→