Analyzing Continuous Physiologic Data to Find Hemodynamic Signatures Associated With New Brain Injury After Congenital Heart Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Continuous data capture technology is becoming more common. Establishing analytic approaches for continuous data could aid in understanding the relationship between physiology and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to design a retrospective analysis for continuous physiologic measurements and their relationship with new brain injury over time after cardiac surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study in the Cardiac Critical Care Unit at the Hospital for Sick Children in patients after repair of transposition of the great arteries (TGA) or single ventricle (SV) lesions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Continuously acquired physiologic measurements for up to 72 hours after cardiac surgery were analyzed for association with new brain injury by MRI. Distributions of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (BP), and oxygen saturation (Spo 2 ) for SV and TGA were analyzed graphically and with descriptive statistics over postoperative time for data-driven variable selection. Mixed-effects regression analyses characterized relationships between HR, BP, and Spo 2 and new brain injury over time while accounting for variation between patients, measurement heterogeneity, and missingness. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (60 TGA; 17 SV) were included. New brain injury was seen in 26 (34%). In SV patients, with and without new brain injury, respectively, in the first 24 hours after cardiac surgery, the median (interquartile range) HR was 172.0 beats/min (bpm) (169.7–176.0 bpm) versus 159.6 bpm (145.0–167.0 bpm); systolic BP 74.8 (67.9–78.5 mm Hg) versus 68.9 mm Hg (61.6–70.9 mm Hg). Higher postoperative HR (parameter estimate, 19.4; 95% CI, 7.8–31; p = 0.003 and BP, 8.6; 1.3–15.8; p = 0.024) were associated with new brain injury in SV patients. The strength of this relationship decreased with time. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Retrospective analysis of continuous physiologic measurements can provide insight into changes in postoperative physiology over time and their relationship with new brain injury. This technique could be applied to assess relationships between physiologic data and many patient interventions or outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".