Delay-Aware and Energy-Efficient Carrier Aggregation in 5G Using Double Deep Q-Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As one of the key technologies in 5G networks, Carrier Aggregation (CA) is studied in this paper. In CA, Component Carriers (CCs) can be activated and deactivated depending on multiple factors, e.g., energy consumption and Quality of Service (QoS) demand of users. We propose CC management strategies where each User Equipment (UE) minimizes its average delay and at the same time minimizes its power consumption while considering that CCs can be activated and deactivated only at certain times, as in real-world CA implementations. We first model the problem as a centralized multi-objective optimum CC management problem. Since centralized approaches would impose a large overhead on the system, we then develop a semi-distributed solution by modeling the problem as a stochastic game and propose a multi-agent Double Deep Q-Network (DDQN) based CC management algorithm to solve the stochastic game. We finally compare the proposed approaches with single CC activation and all-CC activation baseline schemes. Simulation results show that our proposed algorithms outperform the all-CC algorithm in terms of UE power consumption and have the capability of transmitting a number of bits with delay close to the all-CC scheme. Meanwhile, our DDQN-based algorithm decreases the UE power consumption by about 20% with respect to the all-CC scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it