MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Force At A Set Voluntary Forearm Muscle Activation Conforms To Muscle Oxygenation At High Intensities

2022· article· en· W4294819923 on OpenAlexaff
P Drouin, Stacey P.A. Forbes, Taylor Liu, Lindsay A. Lew, Ellen McGarity‐Shipley, Michael E. Tschakovsky

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForearmMedicineElectromyographyCardiologyBrachial arteryInternal medicineOxygenationSkeletal musclePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAnatomyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In electrically stimulated muscle, the oxygen conforming response of skeletal muscle is characterized by a down regulation of muscle force for a given electromyography (EMG) when oxygen delivery is reduced, which is rapidly (within 60-sec) reversed when oxygen delivery is restored. Whether this oxygen conforming response exists in voluntary human exercise is unknown. PURPOSE: To test the hypotheses that oxygen conforming 1) occurs during voluntary handgrip exercise 2) is exercise intensity dependent 3) is independent of sex. METHODS: In 6-men and 6-women, handgrip force, forearm EMG, oxyhemoglobin (O2Hb, %) and mean blood velocity (MBV, cm/s) were measured while participants completed 15-min of rhythmic handgrip exercise targeting a forearm EMG equal to that required to achieve 50, 75 and 90% of critical power handgrip force output. At minute 7, 4-min of brachial artery compression was either completed to reduce MBV by ~50% (experimental, EX) or compression was completed next to the brachial artery to simulate compression without affecting MBV (sham, SH). Exercise continued for 4-min after ending compression. RESULTS:Compression: At 4-min, forearm MBV was reduced in all intensities (50%, EX: 11.62 ± 1.44, SH: 24.57 ± 3.07; 75%, EX: 13.64 ± 1.65, SH: 34.35 ± 4.82; 90%, EX:16.71 ± 2.18, SH: 38.63 ± 3.58, all P < 0.05), O2Hb was reduced in 50% (EX: 62.68 ± 5.10, SH: 70.97 ± 4.63, P < 0.05) and 90% (EX: 49.53 ± 3.98, SH: 70.80 ± 2.93, P < 0.05) intensities but not the 75% intensity (EX: 54.95 ± 4.79, SH: 64.37 ± 3.59, P = 0.08). The amount of force produced per EMG (Force/EMG) was reduced in the 75% (EX: 0.90 ± 0.03, SH: 1.01 ± 0.02, P < 0.05) and 90% (EX: 0.86 ± 0.27, SH: 1.01 ± 0.02, P < 0.05) intensities but not the 50% (EX: 0.97 ± 0.03, SH: 1.00 ± 0.02, P > 0.05) intensity. End compression: Forearm MBV and O2Hb was restored within 30-sec for all intensities (90%, EX: 55.98 ± 11.15; SH: 70.72 ± 9.93, P = 0.1289) and force/EMG was restored within 60-sec for 90% (EX: 0.98 ± 0.02; SH: 1.02 ± 0.02, P = 0.279) and 75% (EX: 0.98 ± 0.02; SH: 0.98 ± 0.02, P = 0.929). No sex differences were observed. CONCLUSION: 1) The rapid restoration of force/EMG (within 60-sec) upon restoration of O2Hb is consistent with the existence of an oxygen conforming response in voluntary human exercise that 2) exists only at higher intensities (75% and 90%). 3) This response is independent of sex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCardiovascular and exercise physiology→French-language works237,207→