MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294830369 · doi:10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2006p0221

Low Pressure Gas Dynamic Spray: Shear Localization during Particle Shock Consolidation

2006· article· en· W4294830369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal spray · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceConsolidation (business)Adiabatic shear bandComposite materialShock waveMechanicsShear bandKinetic energyShear (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gas Dynamic Spray (GDS) is a high rate, direct material-deposition process that utilizes the kinetic energy of particles sprayed at supersonic velocities to cause bonding through the particle plastic deformation on impact. GDS seems to be similar to the powder shock consolidation process, which is governed by dynamic regimes of granular material deformation under impulse loading. These regimes are characterized by adiabatic shear band (ASB) formation. This paper describes the preliminary analysis of ASB formation during GDS on the basis of a combination of the Johnson-Cook and shock wave consolidation models. The dependence of the ASB width on different parameters, including initial powder porosity, average impact stress, shear strain, initial temperature, and contact time was determined. The ASB width was found to vary in the range of 0.5–15 μm, which reveals the great localization of particle deformation in the GDS process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it