MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294831069 · doi:10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2006p0917

Polyamide-11 Powder Coatings by Flame Spraying

2006· article· en· W4294831069 on OpenAlexaff
T. Page McAndrew, F. Céré

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal spray · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFlame retardant materials and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyamideMaterials scienceAbrasion (mechanical)Composite materialThermoplasticSubstrate (aquarium)PolymerThermal sprayingCorrosionFluidized bedDegradation (telecommunications)CoatingWaste managementComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Thermoplastic Polyamide-11 powder coatings serve many industries – such as water handling, automotive, and appliances. This utility is based on the ability to simultaneously provide exceptional resistance to: corrosion, impact/abrasion, and numerous chemicals. Typically application is by traditional methods – electrostatic spray or fluidized bed dipping. The present work demonstrates for the first time that the flame spray method can produce Polyamide- 11 powder coatings very close in performance to those produced by traditional methods. The keys are proper substrate pre-heating, and flame conditions that minimize polymer degradation. Coatings performance, impact resistance, and molecular weight data are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThermal spraySame topicFlame retardant materials and propertiesFrench-language works237,207