MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact Of Aerobic Exercise Training On Body Weight, Energy Intake, And Appetite Regulating Hormones In Rats.

2022· article· en· W4294844549 on OpenAlexaff
Isabelle Durocher, Daniel Grant, Marc R. Bomhof

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppetitesedPeptide YYGhrelinLeptinInternal medicineEndocrinologyAerobic exerciseHormoneMedicineInsulinGlucagonEnergy homeostasisWeight lossObesityNeuropeptide Y receptorNeuropeptide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Post-exercise energy compensation (EC) through increased energy intake (EI) has been demonstrated to lead to lower than anticipated weight reduction with physical activity. The physiological mechanisms mediating the increase in EI remain to be fully elucidated. This study sought to determine the mechanisms, independent of bodyweight, that are involved in exercise-induced EC, specifically assessing the homeostatic appetite control system including appetite-regulating hormones in rats. METHODS: Twelve-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 30) fed an AIN-93 M diet were randomized into 1 of 3 groups and completed an 8-week intervention: 1) inactive control (SED); 2) voluntary aerobic exercise through wheel running (EX); and 3) inactive, weight-matched to aerobic exercise (SED-WM). SED-WM was included to assess the weight-independent impact of exercise on appetite-regulating hormones. EI, running distance, and bodyweight were recorded daily. After 8 weeks, an oral glucose tolerance test was conducted and blood samples were taken to assess acyl-ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide-1, peptide YY, insulin, and leptin. At euthanasia, portal blood was collected to examine appetite-regulating hormones and fat pads were collected to assess body composition. RESULTS: Bodyweight increased in all 3 groups. There was a time x group interaction (P < 0.05) for bodyweight, such that bodyweight was initially reduced in EX, but no differences were present between SED and EX at the end of the study. A time x group interaction was observed for EI (P < 0.05), showing an early reduction in EI in EX relative to SED, followed by a steady increase in EI in EX. Relative fat mass was reduced in EX relative to SED (P < 0.05) and SED-WM (P < 0.05). Leptin concentration was lower in EX relative to SED-WM (P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between total body fat and leptin concentration (r = 0.851, P < 0.05). No differences were present between groups for acyl-ghrelin and insulin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that EC through increased EI may be in part responsible for limiting weight reduction with increased physical activity. Based on our findings, a reduction in leptin with exercise appears to be a primary mediating factor contributing to an increase in EI. Funded by NSERC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→