MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294862174 · doi:10.1080/07373937.2022.2117184

Dehydrated fruits and vegetables using low temperature drying technologies and their application in functional beverages: a review

2022· review· en· W4294862174 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrying Technology · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsFood scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although people's perception of fruits and vegetables is green, healthy and nutritious, the consumption of fruits and vegetables for most people around world still does not meet the WHO’s recommendations for a healthy diet. Functional foods and beverages containing functional ingredients with health-improving properties, are gaining increasing popularity among consumers and the food industry. Either hydrous or dried fruit and vegetables formulated into beverages can promote the daily intake and is a splendid delivery approach for nutrients and bioactive compounds to human body. Drying is the good method to preserve fruit and vegetables characterized by high moisture content and perishability. However conventional drying processes are strongly associated with high temperature, which is detrimental to their nutritional and sensory qualities. This work aims to review low temperature drying technologies for fruits and vegetables to better maintain the qualities and expand their application in functional beverages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it