MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294884156 · doi:10.1152/jn.00224.2022

A neurodynamic model of inter-brain coupling in the gamma band

2022· article· en· W4294884156 on OpenAlexafffund
Quentin Moreau, Lena Adel, Caitriona Douglas, Ghazaleh Ranjbaran, Guillaume Dumas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurophysiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAction Observation and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalUniversité de MontréalMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence InstituteCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersFonds de recherche du QuébecJewish General HospitalInstitut de Valorisation des DonnéesCompute Canada
KeywordsCoupling (piping)NeuroscienceElectroencephalographyPhysicsSynchronization (alternating current)PsychologyKuramoto modelRhythmTheta rhythmBrain activity and meditationComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The last years were marked by an increasing interest in multiple-brain recordings. However, the inter-brain coupling arising across interacting individuals also sparks debates about the underlying biological mechanisms. The inter-brain coupling in the gamma band [>30 Hz] was particularly criticized for lacking a theoretical framework. Here, by using biologically informed neural simulations with the Kuramoto model, we assess the role of intra- and inter-brain neural dynamics in the emergence of inter-brain synchrony in the gamma band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurophysiologySame topicAction Observation and SynchronizationFrench-language works237,207