MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294931135 · doi:10.1002/cjoc.202200420

Enhancing Photovoltaic Performance of Asymmetric <scp>Fused‐Ring</scp> Electron Acceptor by Expanding Pyrrole to Pyrrolo[3,2‐<i>b</i>]pyrrole<sup>†</sup>

2022· article· en· W4294931135 on OpenAlexaff
Zemin Wang, Guilong Cai, Peiyao Xue, Zesheng Liu, Boyu Jia, Nan Li, Jiayu Wang, Xinhui Lu, Yuze Lin, Guojie Wang, Xiaowei Zhan

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Chemistry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyrroleChemistryHOMO/LUMORing (chemistry)Dissociation (chemistry)AcceptorElectron acceptorPhotochemistryElectronExcitonElectron donorPhysical chemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryCatalysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comprehensive Summary We propose a strategy to improve performance of unidirectionally extended fused‐ring electron acceptors by using pyrrolo[3,2‐b]pyrrole to replace pyrrole ring, and design two asymmetric nonfullerene acceptors 1PIC and 2PIC. Replacing pyrrole in 1PIC with pyrrolo[3,2‐b]pyrrole remarkably red‐shifts absorption peak by 109 nm, elevates the HOMO and LUMO energy levels, and improves electron mobility. The photovoltaic devices based on blend of PM6 donor and 2PIC acceptor exhibit power conversion efficiency as high as 12.6%, which is much higher than that of PM6:1PIC (3.53%), due to more efficient exciton generation and dissociation, faster and more balanced carrier transport and less charge recombination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of ChemistrySame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207