MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294948359 · doi:10.21107/bep.v2i1.13851

UPAYA BERTAHAN HIDUP INDUSTRI RUMAH TANGGA KERUPUK DI DESA KEDURNGREJO KECAMATAN JABON KABUPATEN SIDOARJO

2021· article· id· W4294948359 on OpenAlexaff
Yessi Wahyu Angga, Henny Oktavianti

Bibliographic record

VenueBuletin Ekonomika Pembangunan · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Upaya kelangsungan hidup dilaksanakan erat kaitannya dengan perusahaan yang dimiliki oleh usaha kecil menengah karena usaha itu sendiri langsung di kelola oleh pemilik dan fleksibel dalam beradaptasi dengan perubahan lingkungan. kerupuk jabon Kedungrejo di Kabupaten Sidoarjo.Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian deskriptif dengan metode kualitatif. Fokus masalah adalah masalah kelangsungan usaha home industry kerupuk Jabon Kedungrejo di Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam dengan informan. Yaitu pemilik industri rumah tangga kerupuk di desa Kedungrejo jabon kabupaten Sidoarjo. Kepala desa dan masyarakat konsumen kerupuk desa Kedungrejo / desa Kedungrejo. Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan kualitatif teknik analisis data. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa upaya kelangsungan usaha industri rumah tangga kerupuk di Kedungrejo Jabon Kabupaten Sidoarjo meliputi, inovasi produk kerupuk dengan berbagai macam varian, melibatkan generasi muda dalam pemasaran dan perluasan kegiatan produksi dan pemasaran yang didistribusikan dalam dan luar kota, hingga keluar pulau . Kata kunci: usaha, bertahan, industri rumah tangga, industri kerupuk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuletin Ekonomika PembangunanSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207