Prediction of Neonatal Respiratory Distress in Term Babies at Birth from Digital Stethoscope Recorded Chest Sounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neonatal respiratory distress is a common condition that if left untreated, can lead to short- and long-term complications. This paper investigates the usage of digital stethoscope recorded chest sounds taken within 1 min post-delivery, to enable early detection and prediction of neonatal respiratory distress. Fifty-one term newborns were included in this study, 9 of whom developed respiratory distress. For each newborn, 1 min anterior and posterior recordings were taken. These recordings were pre-processed to remove noisy segments and obtain high-quality heart and lung sounds. The random undersampling boosting (RUSBoost) classifier was then trained on a variety of features, such as power and vital sign features extracted from the heart and lung sounds. The RUSBoost algorithm produced specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy results of 85.0%, 66.7% and 81.8%, respectively. Clinical relevance--- This paper investigates the feasibility of digital stethoscope recorded chest sounds for early detection of respiratory distress in term newborn babies, to enable timely treatment and management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".