MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294991323 · doi:10.1088/1361-6498/ac8ffb

On the operational quantity for eye lens neutron dosimetry considering ICRU 95 report

2022· article· en· W4294991323 on OpenAlexaff
S. Djeffal, J. Dubeau, Jiansheng Sun, Fawaz Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Radiological Protection · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear LaboratoriesPublic Works and Government Services CanadaCanadian Nuclear Safety Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquivalent doseEye lensRadiation protectionDosimetryDosimeterImaging phantomAbsorbed doseLens (geology)Nuclear medicineNeutronEffective dose (radiation)Medical physicsMonte Carlo methodMedicinePhysicsOpticsNuclear physicsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For planned occupational exposure situations, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication 118 recommends an equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye of 20 mSv yr −1 averaged over 5 yr with no single year exceeding 50 mSv. Regulatory authorities of various jurisdictions worldwide followed some or all, of the ICRP recommendations and implemented reduced occupational lens of eye dose limits in their legislation. As compliance with the eye-lens dose limit will be based on the summation of doses received from all types of radiation, applicable to a variety of workplaces, the contribution of neutrons to eye lens dose will be important where it contributes a significant fraction of the total dose to the eye lens. This work presents and discusses computed personal absorbed dose ( D lens /Φ), and personal dose equivalent ( H p (3)/Φ) as well as a newly proposed relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted absorbed dose (RBE × D lens /Φ) conversion coefficients for the lens of the eye for neutron exposure at incident energies from thermal to ∼20 MeV. The D lens /Φ coefficients were obtained from a simulation model developed for this study that contains the stylised eye model embedded in the adult UF-ORNL mathematical phantom. The modelling techniques used in these simulations were also used to calculate H p (3)/Φ for the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) slab and cylinder phantoms. All simulations carried out for this study utilised the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) series of codes. The results are compared with the related published data. The issue of compliance with the current equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye is addressed from a neutron perspective considering the recent proposed redefinition of the operational quantities for external radiation exposure in ICRU report 95. The use of a radiation weighted absorbed dose (RBE × D lens , in Gy) is proposed for the tissue reactions in the eye-lens for neutron radiation as per the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements report 180, and in line with the recent review and revision of the System of Radiological Protection To Keeping the ICRP Recommendations Fit for Purpose, which states that RBE weighted dose should be used for high-Linear energy transfer (LET) radiations such as neutrons. This confirms the earlier statement in ICRP publication 92, paragraph 297 and reiterated in the Executive summary, paragraph (q) of ICRP publication 118. The proposed approach would provide an operational quantity consistent with the units of the new eye-lens dose limits without being overly conservative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Radiological ProtectionSame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207