Pemindahan Ibu Kota Baru Jawa Barat: Altruisme versus Non-Altruisme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat berencana memindahkan ibu kota Provinsi Jawa Barat dari kota Bandung ke tempat lain. Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat menilai kota Bandung sudah terlalu padat dan tidak layak menjadi pusat pemerintahan. Namun, masyarakat pro dan kontra terhadap kebijakan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi pemikiran masyarakat yang setuju dan tidak setuju, serta menyusun model hipotesis pengelompokan pendapat tersebut. Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan dengan membagikan kuesioner daring yang berisi pertanyaan terbuka. Data teks yang terkumpul dianalisis menggunakan analisis konten konvensional (conventional content analysis). Dari hasil analisis terungkap dua kelompok pendapat. Pendapat yang setuju cenderung altruisme dan pendapat yang tidak setuju cenderung non- altruisme. Altruisme adalah kelompok yang mengutamakan kemajuan kota lain. Non-altruisme adalah kelompok yang mengutamakan kemajuan kota Bandung.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".