MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intelligent Relay Based on Artificial Neural Networks ANN for Transmission Line

2022· article· en· W4295036481 on OpenAlexaff
Raghda Alilouch, Fouad Slaoui-Hasnaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkBackpropagationElectric power transmissionComputer scienceFault (geology)RelayElectric power systemProtective relayTransmission lineTransmission (telecommunications)Feedforward neural networkTransmission systemArtificial intelligenceFault detection and isolationPower-system protectionEngineeringPower (physics)TelecommunicationsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The detection of faults on transmission lines is an essential and important part of power system monitoring and control. Providing high-quality electric power requires an efficient, reliable, and intelligent protection, a system that can handle transmission line outages that result from a variety of random reasons. This system will allow a fast detection and gives an accurate fault location, thus isolating the faulted section and avoiding catastrophic damage to material and human assets.In this paper, the use of artificial neural network algorithm ANN is proposed, which can be implemented in a numerical relay, this approach has been noticed by many researchers in the field of power system protection. ANN is trained using the measurements of the three-phase currents and voltages. The feedforward neural network was used together with the backpropagation algorithm to detect, classify, and localize the fault. To validate the choice of the neural network, a detailed analysis was performed with a different number of hidden layers. Simulation results show that the present artificial neural network-based method performs satisfactorily in detecting, classifying, and locating faults on transmission lines. To test the proposed method, different fault scenarios were simulated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207