MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigation of MIMO State Feedback Controller for Grid-Connected AC-DC Voltage Source Converters

2022· article· en· W4295036638 on OpenAlexaff
Taleb Vahabzadeh, Sheraz Baig, Seyyadmilad Ebrahimi, Juri Jatskevich

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Linear-quadratic regulatorConvertersController (irrigation)Voltage sourceVoltage regulatorMIMOComputer scienceFull state feedbackVoltage controllerVoltageEngineeringElectronic engineeringVoltage droopElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Voltage source converters (VSCs) are widely used for AC-DC power conversion and their control performance is important for the stability and dynamic behavior of the system. This paper investigates a multi-input-multi-output (MIMO) state feedback controller for AC-DC VSCs to regulate the DC-link voltage and AC side power factor in the presence of large disturbances. The MIMO state feedback controller is designed based on pole placement (SF-PP) and linear quadratic regulator (SF-LQR) methods. The goal of this paper is to design a simple and effective controller that alleviates the burden of tuning parameters. The time-domain performance of the proposed controller is compared to the conventional decoupled dq-vector PI based control with two nested-loops with three PI controllers tuned based on the first-order-time-delay (FOTD) approach. The small-signal DC impedance-based analysis is employed to demonstrate the dynamic behavior of different controllers in the frequency-domain. Simulation results demonstrate the superior performance of the SF-LQR in controlling DC-link voltage over PI controller and comparable performance of SF-PP to PI controller for regulating power factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET)Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207