MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295038178 · doi:10.1109/icjece.2022.3192312

Wind Farm Fast Response Contribution in Power Frequency Control, Using a New Configuration and Control System Based on MPPT and Fine Tune Power Algorithm

2022· article· en· W4295038178 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Mastanabadi, Gholamreza Aghajani, Davar Mirabbasi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximum power point trackingWind powerPower optimizerMaximum power principleControl theory (sociology)Power (physics)Frequency gridPower controlElectric power systemDynamic demandGridAutomatic frequency controlComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)Photovoltaic systemVoltageInverterMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, with the increasing expansion of the power grid and the use of wind energy systems, the issue of frequency control of the power system in their presence is very important. In traditional power systems, the control of frequency is generally performed by hydroelectric power plants that are the slack bus of the grid. They usually have fast dynamic responses, capable of changing the power output rapidly. This can be difficult in cases such as drought, lack of large hydropower plants, or the expansion of the power grid. In this article, a new topology and control system for a wind farm connected to a four-area grid through an high voltage dc (HVdc) link is presented, which can participate in the issue of frequency control of the power system. The proposed system is based on maximum power point tracking (MPPT) and fine tune control of the permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG)-based wind farm. The simulation results were evaluated on a four-area power grid, they were compared with the absence of wind farm in frequency control, and the desired results with appropriate and acceptable dynamic responses were achieved. The simulation results were performed on the MATLAB/Simulink environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.155
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207