MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Keynote Speaker

2022· article· en· W4295038237 on OpenAlexaff
Akshay Kumar, Andrew Smith, Keynote Speaker, M Ayman

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Emerging Technologies (GlobConET) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformInverterSpace vector modulationPulse-width modulationVoltageModulation (music)CapacitorComputer scienceElectronic engineeringThree-phaseControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation (SPWM) technique has been a powerful method to generate sine waveform at inverter output from a fixed dc link input.Similarly, space vector modulation (SVM) has been widely adopted to produce the three-phase sine AC output from a fixed dc link.These two modulation techniques are implemented on 3-phase 3-leg (6 switches) six-step inverter topology if the dc link voltage is much higher than desired three-phase rms output.However, if the source/dc link voltage is lower or much lower than ac rms output, then frond-end dc/dc converters becomes necessary.To implement existing SVM or carrier based modulation, traditionally large number of semiconductor devices, three-phase magnetics, and bulky unreliable electrolytic capacitor are employed to develop a high voltage dc link at inverter input.Novel Single-reference-Six-Pulse Modulation (SRSPM) substantially reduces the number of semiconductor devices and magnetics and eliminates the dc link electrolytic capacitor allowing pulsating dc link voltage waveform at the inverter input.It significantly reduces the cost, size, and weight and improves reliability of the system.The control complexity is much simplified because of the reduced reference signals generation and gate driving requirements .This novel SRSPM is simple and results in saving of 87% switching losses.The concept has been experimentally implemented and demonstrated with closed loop control to achieve 97% efficiency at low voltage high current specifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6470.430

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Emerging Technologies (GlobConET)Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207