MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295047534 · doi:10.1109/mcse.2022.3186227

Formal Modeling and Simulation for SARS-CoV-2 Containment Scenarios in Catalonia

2022· article· en· W4295047534 on OpenAlexaff
Pau Fonseca i Casas, Joan Garcia i Subirana, Víctor García i Carrasco, Xavier Pi i Palomés, Gabriel Wainer

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing in Science & Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceContainment (computer programming)PandemicProcess (computing)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Formal verificationMultidisciplinary approachFormal specificationFormal methodsFormal descriptionFormal languageH1n1 pandemicSoftware engineeringProgramming languageInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We define interrelated models to simulate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Catalonia, which can be used to effectively build simulation applications and analyze the effects of nonpharmaceutical interventions. Due to the constant evolution of this pandemic, and the need to take a multidisciplinary approach, we use a formal specification to represent the model and to validate the model assumptions. We discuss the definition of the model using formal languages, and the Specification and Description Language to improve communication between stakeholders. We show formalization details, discuss implications in the validation process, and present how results obtained from the model of the pandemic in Catalonia can be used for decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputing in Science & EngineeringSame topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207