MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evidence of Partial Seniority Conservation in the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>9</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> Shell for the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:math> Isotones

2022· article· lv· W4295090400 on OpenAlexaff
R. M. Pérez-Vidal, A. Gadea, C. Domingo‐Pardo, A. Gargano, J. J. Valiente-Dobón, E. Clément, A. Lemasson, L. Coraggio, M. Siciliano, S. Szilner, M. Bast, T. Braunroth, J. Collado, A. Corina, Α. Dewald, M. Doncel, J. Dudouet, G. de France, C. Fransen, V. González, T. Hüyük, B. Jacquot, P. R. John, A. Jungclaus, Y.H. Kim, A. Korichi, M. Labiche, S. M. Lenzi, H. Li, J. Ljungvall, А. Лопез-Мартенс, D. Mengoni, C. Michelagnoli, C. Müller-Gatermann, D. R. Napoli, A. Navin, B. Quintana, D. Ramos, M. Rejmund, E. Sanchís, J. Simpson, O. Stézowski, D. Wilmsen, M. Zielińska, A.J. Boston, D. Barrientos, P. Bednarczyk, G. Benzoni, B. Birkenbach, H.C. Boston, A. Bracco, B. Cederwall, D. M. Cullen, F. Didierjean, J. Eberth, A. Gottardo, J. Goupil, L. J. Harkness-Brennan, H. Hess, D. S. Judson, A. Kaşkaş, W. Korten, S. Leoni, R. Menegazzo, B. Million, J. Nyberg, Zs. Podolyák, A. Pullia, D. Ralet, F. Recchia, P. Reiter, K. Rezynkina, M.-D. Salsac, M. Şenyiğit, D. Sohler, Ch. Theisen, D. Verney

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNuclear PhysicsHrvatska Zaklada za ZnanostAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónOffice of ScienceHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeGeneralitat ValencianaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean CommissionU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsValence (chemistry)SeniorityPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reduced transition probabilities for the ${4}_{1}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{2}_{1}^{+}$ and ${2}_{1}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{0}_{1}^{+}$ transitions in $^{92}\mathrm{Mo}$ and $^{94}\mathrm{Ru}$ and for the ${4}_{1}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{2}_{1}^{+}$ and ${6}_{1}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{4}_{1}^{+}$ transitions in $^{90}\mathrm{Zr}$ have been determined in this experiment making use of a multinucleon transfer reaction. These results have been interpreted on the basis of realistic shell-model calculations in the ${f}_{5/2}$, ${p}_{3/2}$, ${p}_{1/2}$, and ${g}_{9/2}$ proton valence space. Only the combination of extensive lifetime information and large scale shell-model calculations allowed the extent of the seniority conservation in the $N=50$ ${g}_{9/2}$ orbital to be understood. The conclusion is that seniority is largely conserved in the first $\ensuremath{\pi}{g}_{9/2}$ orbital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207