MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295210979 · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12092184

A Comprehensive 2D-LC/MS/MS Profile of the Normal Human Urinary Metabolome

2022· article· en· W4295210979 on OpenAlexaff
Jiyu Xu, Shuxin Zheng, Mimi Li, Xiaoyan Liu, Haidan Sun, Zhengguang Guo, Jing Wei, Lulu Jia, Wei Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueDiagnostics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsCanada Research Chairs
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMetabolomeUrineUrinary systemMetabolismMetabolomicsMetaboliteMetabolic pathwayChemistryBiochemistryChromatographyBiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Profiling bodily fluids is crucial for monitoring and discovering metabolic markers of disease. In this study, a comprehensive analysis approach based on 1D-LC-MS/MS and 2D-LC-MS/MS was applied to profile normal human urine metabolites from 348 children and 315 adults. A total of 2357 metabolites were identified, including 1831 endogenous metabolites and 526 exogenous ones. In total, 1005 metabolites were identified in urine for the first time. The urinary metabolites were mainly involved in amino acid metabolism, small molecule biochemistry, lipid metabolism and cellular compromise. The comparison of adult's and children's urine metabolomes showed adults urine had more metabolites involved in immune response than children's, but the function of binding of melatonin, which belongs to the endocrine system, showed a higher expression in children. The urine metabolites detected by the 1D-LC-MS/MS method were mainly related to amino acid metabolism and lipid metabolism, and the 2D-LC-MS/MS method not only explored metabolites from 1D-LC-MS/MS but also metabolites related to cell signaling, cell function and maintenance, etc. Our analysis comprehensively profiled and functionally annotated the metabolome of normal human urine, which would benefit the application of urinary metabolome to clinical research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiagnosticsSame topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesFrench-language works237,207