MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295211019 · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33029-x

Grave-to-cradle upcycling of Ni from electroplating wastewater to photothermal CO2 catalysis

2022· article· en· W4295211019 on OpenAlexafffund
Shenghua Wang, Dake Zhang, Wu Wang, Jun Zhong, Kai Feng, Zhiyi Wu, Boyu Du, Jiaqing He, Zhengwen Li, Le He, Wei Sun, Deren Yang, Geoffrey A. Ozin

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSoochow UniversityFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaGovernment of CanadaSalt Science Research Foundation
KeywordsCatalysisElectroplatingHazardous wastePhotothermal therapyMaterials scienceWastewaterChemical engineeringSewage treatmentWaste managementPetrochemicalNanotechnologyChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Treating hazardous waste Ni from the electroplating industry is mandated world-wide, is exceptionally expensive, and carries a very high CO 2 footprint. Rather than regarding Ni as a disposable waste, the chemicals and petrochemicals industries could instead consider it a huge resource. In the work described herein, we present a strategy for upcycling waste Ni from electroplating wastewater into a photothermal catalyst for converting CO 2 to CO. Specifically, magnetic nanoparticles encapsulated in amine functionalized porous SiO 2 , is demonstrated to efficiently scavenge Ni from electroplating wastewater for utilization in photothermal CO 2 catalysis. The core-shell catalyst architecture produces CO at a rate of 1.9 mol·g Ni −1 ·h −1 (44.1 mmol·g cat −1 ·h −1 ), a selectivity close to 100%, and notable long-term stability. This strategy of upcycling metal waste into functional, catalytic materials offers a multi-pronged approach for clean and renewable energy technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207