MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295279031 · doi:10.24123/soshum.v3i1.5224

Perceived Discrimination sebagai Mediator Hubungan antara Akulturasi dan Kesejahteraan Psikologis pada Mahasiswa Etnis Tionghoa

2022· article· en· W4295279031 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKELUWIH Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicStudent Stress and Coping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyAcculturationNonprobability samplingEthnic groupSocial psychologyMediationHumanitiesSociologyAnthropologyDemographyPopulationSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract—The purpose of this research wastoexamine the relationship between acculturation and the psychological well-being of ethnic Chinese students with perceived discrimination as a mediator. This study used quantitative methods, with a cross-sectional survey design. The respondents (N=97) were ethnicChinese students studying at public universities, selected using purposive sampling. The data was collected online using the Vancouver Index Acculturation (VIA), Brief Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Questionnaire-Community Version (Brief PEDQ-CV), and Psychological Well-Being Questionnaire (PWB-42). The results of the mediation test showed that perceived discrimination was a full mediator in the relationship between acculturation and the psychological well-being of ethnic Chinese students studying at public universities (z=-1.988; p <0.05).This finding revealed that as a minority, ethnic Chinese students accepted or adapted to the majority culture to reduce discrimination and this mechanism could improve their psychological well-being.The theoretical and practical implications of this research are discussed further.
 Keywords: acculturation, psychological well-being, perceived discrimination, chinese ethnicity
 Abstrak—Penelitian bertujuan menguji hubungan antara akulturasi dengan kesejahteraan psikologis mahasiswa etnis Tionghoa dengan perceived discrimination sebagai mediator. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif, dengan design cross sectional survei. Partisipan penelitian (N= 97) merupakan mahasiswa etnis Tionghoa yang berkuliah di perguruan tinggi negeri. Metode sampling yang digunakan yaitu purposive sampling. Pengumpulan data menggunakan tiga skala yaitu Vancouver Index Acculturation, Brief Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Questionnaire-Community Version (Brief PEDQ-CV), danPsychological Well-Being Questionnaire (PWB-42). Hasil uji hipotesis dengan uji mediasi menunjukkan bahwa perceived discrimination menjadi mediator full terhadap hubungan antara akulturasi dengan kesejahteraan psikologis mahasiswa etnis Tionghoa yang berkuliah di perguruan tinggi negeri(z=-1.988; p <0.05).Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa sebagai minoritas, mahasiswa etnis Tionghoa melakukan penerimaan atau adaptasi terhadap budaya mayoritas untukmenurunkandiskriminasi yang dihadapinya dan mekanisme ini dapat meningkatkan kesejahteraan psikologisnya. Implikasi teoritis dan praktis penelitian ini, didiskusikan lebih lanjut.
 Kata kunci: akulturasi, kesejahteraan psikologis, diskriminasi yang dirasakan, etnis tionghoa

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it