MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295309598 · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000002102

Cryoneurolysis of Anterior and Posterior Divisions of the Obturator Nerve

2022· article· es· W4295309598 on OpenAlexaff
Fraser MacRae, Arman Brar, Ève Boissonnault, Paul Winston

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaIsland Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObturator nerveAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This feature is a unique combination of text (voice) and video that more clearly presents and explains procedures in musculoskeletal medicine. These videos will be available on the journal’s Website. We hope that this feature will change and enhance the learning experience. Walter R. Frontera, MD, PhD Editor-in-Chief URL: https://links.lww.com/PHM/B825 A scissoring and often painful gait sequelae to spastic hip adduction can be detrimental to an individual’s ability to ambulate.1 In addition, the spasticity may impede catheterization and cause poor perineal hygiene and ensuing skin or bladder infections and impaired sexual function may arise.2 Hip adduction spasticity may occur in neurological disorders, including spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, cerebral palsy, hereditary spastic paraparesis, and multiple sclerosis.1 Interventions that target the obturator nerve can relieve pain, decrease spasticity, and improve hygiene for 3 mos.1 The obturator nerve arises from the lumbar plexus and diverges into anterior and posterior branches.2 The anterior branch courses between adductor longus and brevis muscles, as well as supplies motor innervation to the adductor longus, adductor brevis, gracilis, and sometimes the pectineus.2 The posterior branch travels between the adductor brevis and magnus muscles supplying adductor magnus and brevis and occasionally the obturator externus and adductor longus.2 The obturator nerve supplies sensory innervation to the hip and knee joints and medial thigh.2 Historically used for analgesia, cryoneurolysis is a novel, adjuvant treatment for problematic spasticity.3 Cryoneurolysis of the musculocutaneous, radial, and tibial nerves has led to improvements in Modified Ashworth Scale, Modified Tardieu Scale, and gait.3 Cryoneurolysis engages a specialized probe with a tip capable of freezing to colder than −60°C.3,4 By positioning the probe’s tip on the selected nerve, a limited zone of axon and myelin disruption is created.3,4 Subsequently, the slow breakdown of the axon occurs—a phenomenon known as axonotomesis and Wallerian degeneration. The process preserves the epineural tube; thus, the nerve can regenerate over time. Case reports showed a reduction in spasticity maintained at a final 17-mo follow-up.3 Before cryoneurolysis, a diagnostic nerve block with 2% lidocaine is performed. This will cause a temporary nerve block and predict whether the longer lasting cryoneurolysis can be successful, ensure there is no significant sensory disturbance, or unwanted weakness. To localize the obturator nerve for cryoneurolysis, we propose two approaches using ultrasound guidance and electrostimulation: transverse and longitudinal. The patient is supine with their hip slightly abducted. TRANSVERSE The probe is advanced lateral to medial at 45 degrees. The obturator vessels appear with the anterior divisions arising above and the posterior below the vessels (Figs. 1A–C). Color Doppler can enhance localization (Fig. 1D).FIGURE 1: Ultrasound visualization of the obturator nerve (anterior and posterior branches). A, Anterior division of the obturator nerve, visualized using the transverse approach. B, Ultrasound probe placement and entry point for the transverse approach. C, Posterior division of the obturator nerve, visualized using the transverse approach. D, Localization of the blood vessel using color Doppler. E, Ultrasound probe placement and entry point for the longitudinal approach. F, Anterior and posterior branches of the obturator nerve visualized with the longitudinal approach.LONGITUDINAL APPROACH The transducer is sagittal along the anteromedial thigh, and the probe is advanced in-plane cephalad 45 degrees. The anterior branch is visualized at the plane separating adductor longus and brevis. The posterior branch is targeted by advancing the probe and initiating the freezing sequence in the hyperechoic fascia between the adductor brevis and magnus (Figs. 1E, F). To treat muscles innervated by each branch of the obturator nerve, the probe is repositioned between lesions. To ensure the nerve lesion interrupts innervation to all spastic adductor muscles, we recommend creating at least two lesions along the length of each branch.3 E-stimulation at less than 1 mA is essential for accurately targeting the desired branches and not the muscle bellies.3 Further studies are required to validate the safety and efficacy of the approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207