Hourglass, a tool to mine bioimaging data, uncovers sex-disparities in the IL-6-associated T cell response in pancreatic tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Recent advances in digital pathology have led to an explosion in high-content multidimensional imaging approaches. Yet, our ability to gainfully process, visualize, integrate and mine the resulting mass of bioimaging data remains a challenge. We have developed Hourglass, an open access user-friendly software that streamlines complex biology-driven post-processing and visualization of multiparametric data. Directed at datasets derived from tissue microarrays or imaging methods that analyze multiple regions of interest per patient specimen, Hourglass systematically organizes observations across spatial and global levels as well as within patient subgroups. Application of Hourglass to our large and complex pancreatic cancer bioimaging dataset (540,617 datapoints derived from 26 bioimaging analyses applied to 596 specimens from 165 patients) consolidated a breadth of known IL-6 functions in a well-annotated human pancreatic cancer cohort and uncovered new unprecedented insights into a sex-linked Interleukin-6 (IL-6) association with immune phenotypes. Specifically, regional effects of IL-6 on the intratumoral T cell response were restricted to male patients only. In conclusion, Hourglass facilitates multi-layered knowledge extraction from complex multiparametric bioimaging datasets and provides tailored analytical means to productively harness heterogeneity at the sample and patient level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".