MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial - French Research in Information Sciences and Partnership

2022· editorial· en· W4295413066 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Éthel Gamache

Bibliographic record

VenuePartnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipPleasureFrenchLibrary sciencePolitical scienceSociologyComputer sciencePsychologyArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partnership aims to encourage the dissemination of Canadian Francophone and Anglophone scientific production in library and information science. This issue highlights research in French with three articles. These quality manuscripts touch on different issues and were a pleasure to read and edit. But, for an issue dedicated to research published in French, why are there so few articles?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0120.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePartnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and ResearchSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207