GLP-1 attenuates intestinal fat absorption and chylomicron production via vagal afferent nerves originating in the portal vein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: GLP-1R agonists have been shown to reduce fasting and postprandial plasma lipids, both of which are independent risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease. However, how endogenous GLP-1 - which is rapidly degraded - modulates intestinal and hepatic lipid metabolism is less clear. A vagal gut-brain-axis originating in the portal vein has been proposed as a possible mechanism for GLP-1's anti-lipemic effects. Here we sought to examine the relationship between vagal GLP-1 signalling and intestinal lipid absorption and lipoprotein production. METHODS: , and postprandial and fasting plasma TG, TRL TG, or VLDL TG were examined. These experiments were repeated during sympathetic blockade, and under a variety of pharmacological or surgical deafferentation techniques. In addition, hamsters received nodose ganglia injections of a GLP-1R agonist or antagonist to further probe the vagal pathway. Peripheral studies were repeated in a novel GLP-1R KO hamster model and in our diet-induced hamster models of insulin resistance. RESULTS: site-specifically reduced postprandial and fasting plasma lipids in both hamsters and mice. These inhibitory effects of GLP-1 were investigated via pharmacological and surgical denervation experiments and found to be dependent on intact afferent vagal signalling cascades and efferent changes in sympathetic tone. Furthermore, GLP-1R agonism in the nodose ganglia resulted in markedly reduced postprandial plasma TG and TRL TG, and fasting VLDL TG and this nodose GLP-1R activity was essential for portal GLP-1s effect. Notably, portal and nodose ganglia GLP-1 effects were lost in GLP-1R KO hamsters and following diet-induced insulin resistance. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrates for the first time that portal GLP-1 modulates postprandial and fasting lipids via a complex vagal gut-brain-liver axis. Importantly, loss or interference with this signalling axis via surgical, pharmacological, or dietary intervention resulted in the loss of portal GLP-1s anti-lipemic effects. This supports emerging evidence that native GLP-1 works primarily through a vagal neuroendocrine mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".