Multi-Level Classification of Lung Pathologies in Neonates using Recurrence Features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of Lung Ultrasound (LUS) as a tool to diagnose and monitor lung diseases in neonates has increased in urban hospitals. LUS's main advantages compared to chest CT or X-rays is that it is less expensive, more accessible, and does not expose the patient to radiation. Performing LUS on neonates and diagnosing the LUS images require highly trained medical professional and clinicians. While availability of such specialists in general is not an issue in urban areas, there is lack of such personnel in rural and remote communities. Hence, an automated computer-aided screening approach as a first level diagnosis assistance in such scenarios might be of significant value. Many of the image morphologies used by clinicians in diagnosing the LUS have strong recurrence characteristics. Building upon this knowledge, in this paper, we propose a feature extraction method designed to quantify such recurrent features for classification of LUS images into 6 common neonatal lung conditions. These conditions were normal lung, chronic lung disease (CLD), transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), pneumothorax (PTX), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and consolidation (CON) that could be pneumonia or atelectasis. The proposed method extracts virtual scanlines from the LUS images and converts them into signals. Then using recurrence quantification analysis (RQA), features were extracted and fed to pattern classifiers. Using a simple linear classifier the proposed features can achieve a classification accuracy of 69.3% without clinical features and 77.6% with clinical features. Clinical Relevance- Development of an automated computer-aided screening tool for first level diagnosis assistance in neonatal LUS pathologies. Such a tool will be of significant value in rural and remote medical communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".