MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295560129 · doi:10.48075/aoristo.v1i1.16520

A Subjetividade como Fundamento da Técnica

2000· article· pt· W4295560129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAoristo - International Journal of Phenomenology Hermeneutics and Metaphysics · 2000
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Testimony
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesSubjectivityEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partindo de uma abordagem da conexão entre a técnica e a subjetividade no pensamento de Martin Heidegger, a partir de A questão da técnica e A época da imagem de mundo, o artigo pretende tematizar o modo como o ser humano se coloca no mundo, de acordo com a questão do ser. Para tanto, é preciso recorrer ao ensaio A origem da obra de arte, no qual se indica uma noção "produtiva" de técnica (techné) a partir do fenômeno da arte e da poesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it