MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295560214 · doi:10.48075/aoristo.v1i2.18216

Engajamento e falatório: das redes sociais à filosofia

2017· article· pt· W4295560214 on OpenAlexaff
Ericson Falabretti

Bibliographic record

VenueAoristo - International Journal of Phenomenology Hermeneutics and Metaphysics · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Theory and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nesse trabalho discuto duas perspectivas sobre política e engajamento. Para descrever a primeiraforma de engajamento, muito comum nas redes sociais, faço uso do termo heideggerianofalatório. Esse tipo de engajamento se caracteriza pela reprodução do mesmo e pela negação dadiferença. Já a segunda noção de engajamento, pensada a partir das obras de Sartre e Merleau-Ponty, em clara oposição ao falatório, remete a um exame de três características fundamentais doengajamento intelectual: práxis, compromisso, responsabilidade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAoristo - International Journal of Phenomenology Hermeneutics and MetaphysicsSame topicCritical Theory and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207