Frequency of different types of El Niño events under global warming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is the dominant natural climate pattern that influences the global climate on subdecadal timescales. Thus, a better understanding of the impacts of global warming on the characteristics of ENSO events offers large socioeconomic benefits. Changes in the frequency of the eastern Pacific (EP), central Pacific (CP) and total El Niño events are analysed in the future period (2051–2100) under the two shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) scenarios (i.e., SSP2‐4.5 and SSP5‐8.5) compared to the historical period (1951–2000) using outputs of eight models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Types of El Niño events are diagnosed based on pattern correlation coefficients (PCCs) between monthly sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies and the first two leading empirical orthogonal function (EOF) modes of SST anomalies in the tropical Pacific. Based on the ensemble of models, the number of total El Niño events decreases by 26 and 16% under the SSP2‐4.5 and SSP5‐8.5 scenarios, respectively, in the future compared to the historical period. A smaller decrease in the number of total El Niño events under the faster warming rate of the SSP5‐8.5 scenario suggests that the response of ENSO dynamics to global warming is not linear. Analysis of the Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature, version 5 (ERSSTv5) dataset during the period 1951–2020 indicates that the ratio of the number of CP El Niño to EP El Niño has substantially increased over the past two decades. Nevertheless, under both the SSP2‐4.5 and SSP5‐8.5 scenarios in the future period, the ratio of the number of CP El Niño to EP El Niño does not change considerably compared to that in the historical period. This suggests that the recent increase in the frequency of CP El Niño could be a result of multidecadal variations rather than anthropogenic global warming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".