MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295752661 · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00494

Introduction: Cryo-EM in Biology and Materials Research

2022· review· en· W4295752661 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sriram Subramaniam, Dganit Danino

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Reviews · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationAltmetricsSocial mediaLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebOriginal researchComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEEditorialNEXTIntroduction: Cryo-EM in Biology and Materials ResearchSriram Subramaniam*Sriram SubramaniamThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada*Email: [email protected]More by Sriram SubramaniamView Biographyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4231-4115 and Dganit Danino*Dganit DaninoTechnion, Haifa, Israel 32000*Email: [email protected]More by Dganit DaninoView BiographyCite this: Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 17, 13881–13882Publication Date (Web):September 14, 2022Publication History Received12 July 2022Published online14 September 2022Published inissue 14 September 2022https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00494https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00494editorialACS PublicationsCopyright © Published 2022 by American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views2083Altmetric-Citations-LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (903 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Biology,Crystal structure,Electronic structure,Peptides and proteins,Protein structure Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.276
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ReviewsSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207