Traffic Safety Optimization Strategy of Mountainous Highway Tunnel Based on GA-SVR Visual Load Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Improving the driving safety of mountainous highway tunnels has become an urgent problem in China, while the existing literature pays more attention to the safety of urban tunnels. From the perspective of visual load, this paper built a GA-SVR model to analyze the influences of speed, design brightness, measured brightness, and position in the Gaogu long tunnel. The results show the following: firstly, the changes of MTPA in the long mountainous highway tunnels can be divided into five stages, which is different from the three-stage division of urban tunnels; secondly, the influencing degree of factors was varied in different stages: the position factor mattered most in stages 1, 2, 4, and 5, while the design brightness had the greatest impact in stage 3; thirdly, the driver’s psychological pressure was greatest on the entrance and exit section of the tunnel; lastly, the increased length of mountainous highway tunnels and the long-term enclosed driving environment made the psychological load of drivers intensified. Therefore, it was necessary for the mountainous highway tunnels to consider more accurate gradual lighting design in the 200-m sections after the entrance and before the exit, meanwhile enhancing traffic safety management and protections in the middle of the tunnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".