MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295832268 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2022.3206213

Towards Energy-Efficient Data Collection by Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Base Station With NOMA for Emergency Communications in IoT

2022· article· en· W4295832268 on OpenAlexaff
Shu Fu, Xiaohui Guo, Fang Fang, Zhiguo Ding, Ning Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorWestern University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBase stationDefault gatewayComputer scienceTransmitter power outputReal-time computingComputer networkEfficient energy usePower (physics)DroneEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For emergency communications in an internet of thing (IoT) network, a large number of gateways are distributed to gather the data traffic. Considering the practical difficulty of deploying multiple territorial base stations (TBSs) in a wide range, unmanned aerial vehicle base station (UAV-BS) can fly to a specific point and hover above there to collect data traffic from gateways. In this paper, we aim to maximize the UAV-BS energy efficiency under the constraints of total serving delay, UAV-BS flying speed, and the maximum available transmitting power of gateways, etc. Firstly, we propose a distributed gateway cluster (GC) algorithm to group gateways into multiple GCs based on the distances among gateways. Next, the UAV-BS flies and hovers above each GC, where the gateways in the GC simultaneously transmit data to the UAV-BS by non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA). By analyzing the NOMA feature, we propose theorems optimizing the UAV-BS hovering height to minimize the transmitting power of the gateway with the maximum transmitting power among the gateways in a GC. Based on the proposed theorems, we formulate the joint optimization problem to maximize the UAV-BS energy efficiency with only the variables of UAV-BS flying speed and the serving time for each GC. The optimization problem is effectively solved by the geometric programming (GP) method. Finally, we verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms by extensive simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207