MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295832487 · doi:10.1525/001c.37273

“You Will Say, ‘Wow’”: Cinematic Glamping and Ecomasculine Crisis in (and around) <i>The Revenant</i>

2022· article· en· W4295832487 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mario Trono

Bibliographic record

VenueMedia+Environment · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change Communication and Perception
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeFilm directorTributeWildernessAdventureDramaFrontierPower (physics)BeautyStudioAestheticsArtMedia studiesFace (sociological concept)HistorySociologyArt historyLiteratureVisual artsPolitical scienceMovie theaterLawSocial scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explains how the promotional studio narratives and filmmaker interviews for the frontier drama The Revenant (2015), along with the film’s masculinist adventure narrative, have misrepresented and underserved the ecological conditions at the film’s primary shooting locations in western Canada. Although the film ostensibly pays tribute to the beauty and power of spectacular wilderness regions, the media events involving its release and reception amplified the story’s tropes regarding male suffering in the face of hostile nature, thus hampering the film’s ability to call forth environmental identifications from audiences sufficient to helping effect systems change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedia+EnvironmentSame topicClimate Change Communication and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207