Identifying Hydrologic Regimes and Drivers in Nova Scotia, Canada: Catchment Classification Efforts for a Data-Limited Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nova Scotia is a small maritime province with limited capacity to gauge its abundant water resources, but it possesses a diverse geologic setting and surface water distribution. The common engineering practice of using nearest neighbor catchments as hydrologic surrogates may be unreliable in regions such as this. Catchment classification provides a tool to identify and explain variability in hydrologic regimes and inform data transfer across catchments. Here we develop a catchment classification framework using hydrometric, climatic, and landscape data from Nova Scotia, Canada. An inductive classification approach was first used to identify five generalized hydrologic metaclasses based on streamflow signatures derived from 47 long-term streamflow records. We then attempted to replicate this classification using deductive approaches, and identified key physiographic and meteorological variables that could be useful in classifying ungauged catchments. Due to the limited number of gauged catchments, two supervised deductive classification methodologies were applied for comparison: (1) an automated approach often used in more data-rich scenarios (random forests and classification and regression trees); and (2) a nonautomated approach, which involved manual construction and testing of decision trees. The products of the automated approach (random forests), although more robust, may be challenging to apply, while the manually constructed decision tree, which was guided by a combination of local knowledge and theoretical reasoning, could be a useful tool for practitioners. Climate did not emerge as a particularly strong controlling factor in hydrologic variability in this region, but surface water storage had an important role in flow regime across the province. Results demonstrate that this type of hybrid approach can be effective for understanding hydrologic variability and identifying surrogate watersheds in data-limited regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".