“Dejar aprender”: entre filosofía y didáctica de la filosofía en bachillerato
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desarrollo aqui una reflexión hermenéutica sobre algunos asuntos en torno a la enseñanza de la filosofía en bachillerato en Colombia. Siguiendo la escuela de Hermenéutica de Alberta, Canadá, desarrollo la interpretación basado en experiencias reales, etimologías, metáforas y frecuentes conexiones con la vida personal con el fin de profundizar en el fenómeno abordado (no para hallar o revelar su verdad). De esta manera, opto por un lenguaje menos científico y formal que pretenda proponer conocimientos comprobados y definitivos. Resalto así el lado reflexivo del documento. En cuanto al tema o fenómeno, este texto se centra en un prejuicio que probablemente persiste con fuerza entre los docentes de filosofía en Colombia y que nos permite comprender por qué es y ha sido tan difícil cambiar las formas de enseñanza de la filosofía: el maestro es el que debe enseñar y el estudiante aprender. Ofrezco aquí mi interpretación.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".