PSA-Stratified Performance of [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer Patients under Androgen Deprivation Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on in vitro studies, it is known that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) increases prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression on prostate cancer (PCa) cells. However, ADT also has cytoreductive effects which can decrease lesion size. The present evaluation was conducted to further analyze the influence of ongoing ADT on [18F]DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) performance in the setting of biochemically recurrent PCa. We retrospectively evaluated two groups of PCa patients, previously treated with radical intent, who had undergone [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT because of biochemical relapse with a minimum PSA level of 0.4 ng/mL. One group consisted of 95 patients under ADT at the time of the PET examination, and the other consisted of 445 patients not receiving ADT at the time of PET/CT. The uptake characteristics of the cardiac blood pool, liver, parotid glands, and five most active lesions were measured and compared between these two groups. The overall detection rate of [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT in patients under ADT at the time of imaging was significantly higher than patients not under ADT (91.6% vs. 80.4%, p-value = 0.007). However, the PSA-stratified differences in detection rates between patients with and without ADT did not reach statistical significance. Except for the maximal standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SULmax) in the PSA range of 1 to <2 ng/mL, the intensity and volume of [18F]DCFPyL accumulation were higher in patients with ADT compared to the patients without. Statistical significance was attained for the SULmax in PSA range of 0.5 to <1 ng/mL (p-value = 0.0004) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in all PSA ranges (p-values of 0.0005 to 0.03). No significant difference was observed for radiotracer uptake in normal organs between the two groups with and without ADT. In this study population with biochemical recurrence of PCa and measurable PSA, ongoing ADT at the time of [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT imaging was associated with higher radiotracer uptake and overall lesion detection rate. This could be due in part to the more aggressive disease phenotype in patients with ongoing ADT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".