COD removal from actual industrial wastewater using a three‐dimensional electrochemical apparatus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was investigated using a three‐dimensional electrochemical system. The effects of electrode position, pH value, initial temperature, circulation flow, aeration, and addition of hydrogen peroxide on the removal efficiency of the pollutant were studied. The fillers used in the experiment were centimetre‐sized and electrolyte was obtained from an industrial factory with a concentration of COD as high as 25 000–27 500 mg L −1 , which was rare in other studies of the past. The degradation of organics was affected by pH and circulation flow, and a decrease in the initial pH value led to the increase in removal efficiency, while a trend of increasing at first and then decreasing was observed with the extension of circulation flow. Aeration and hydrogen peroxide served as enhanced processes for a higher removal rate. Both ultrasound and ultraviolet had effects on the electrolysis system. Oxygen uptake rate measurement and bio‐treatment experiments demonstrated a significant increase in biodegradability with this three‐dimensional electrochemical system. In addition, a pilot scale test in a pharmaceutical factory showed an economic benefit on energy consumption, which was as low as 10 kWh kg −1 COD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".