MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295865723 · doi:10.1364/ol.468495

Time-variant entropy regulated multiple access for flexible coherent PON

2022· article· en· W4295865723 on OpenAlexaff
Zixian Wei, Jinsong Zhang, Weijia Li, David V. Plant

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrature amplitude modulationOpticsComputer sciencePassive optical networkPhysicsEntropy (arrow of time)Phase-shift keyingAlgorithmBit error rateWavelengthWavelength-division multiplexingDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To further increase the data rate and rate flexibility of next-generation passive optical networks (PONs), we propose a scheme jointing probabilistic constellation shaping (PCS), constellation diagram identification, and coherent detection. The rate of the coherent PON is dynamically regulated with time-variant entropy, and monitored by the image classifier in real-time. The transmitted cascade frames allocated to different optical network units (ONUs) from the optical line terminal (OLT) can be synchronized, identified, and distinguished by the labeled entropy values. The proposed graphic monitoring scheme is experimentally demonstrated based on a dual-polarized coherent optical transmission system. A 0.5 interval value of entropy is precisely tuned to achieve a 96.13% constellation identification accuracy for entropy/rate by a fast normalized cross correlation coefficient (NCC)-based image classifier. A real-time data rate from 350 to 550 Gb/s with PCS-64-quadrature amplitude modulation (64-QAM) format for a single ONU is achieved which can maximally support five independent ONUs with single wavelength and two polarization states and the entropy varying from 3.5 to 5.5 with 0.5 intervals, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207