TSomVar: a tumor-only somatic and germline variant identification method with random forest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Somatic variants act as critical players during cancer occurrence and development. Thus, an accurate and robust method to identify them is the foundation of cutting-edge cancer genome research. However, due to low accessibility and high individual-/sample-specificity of the somatic variants in tumor samples, the detection is, to date, still crammed with challenges, particularly when lacking paired normal samples as control. To solve this burning issue, we developed a tumor-only somatic and germline variant identification method (TSomVar) using the random forest algorithm established on sample-specific variant datasets derived from genotype imputation, reads-mapping level annotation and functional annotation. We trained TSomVar by using genomic variant datasets of three major cancer types: colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and skin cutaneous melanoma. Compared with existing tumor-only somatic variant identification tools, TSomVar shows excellent performances in somatic variant detection with higher accuracy and better capability of recalling for test datasets from colorectal cancer and skin cutaneous melanoma. In addition, TSomVar is equipped with the competence of accurately identifying germline variants in tumor samples. Taken together, TSomVar will undoubtedly facilitate and revolutionize somatic variant explorations in cancer research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".