MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295911161 · doi:10.1002/iir.1469

<i>An invisible man, a double agent, and a five‐tool player</i>: Three issues for the Chief Restructuring Officer in Korean corporate reorganization procedures

2022· article· en· W4295911161 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jae Yup Chung, Byoung Kyu Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Insolvency Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Insolvency and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestructuringDebtorOfficerCreditorBusinessLaw and economicsLawManagementPublic relationsPolitical scienceSociologyEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Chief Restructuring Officer (CRO) system in Korea was introduced in 2011 after the Debtor Reorganization Act adopted the Debtor‐in‐Possession (DIP) system in 2006. However, the introduction of the CRO system in Korea, which was based on the American system, was problematic due to the lack of legal grounds, the vagueness of its legal status, and the complexity of its roles. This article explores the emerging issues related to the status and roles of a CRO in the Korean corporate‐reorganization procedure. Three major issues are analyzed: lack of legal ground and its codification (“Invisible Man”), the dual legal status of being a debtor's adviser and creditors' protector (“Double Agent”), and the expansion of the CRO's roles (“Five‐Tool Players”). This research also sketches the legal landscape of corporate reorganization practice in Korea. It provides some possible suggestions to foster the chances for debtor rehabilitation through improved operation of the CRO system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Insolvency ReviewSame topicCorporate Insolvency and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207