MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295932935 · doi:10.51952/9781847426222.bm001

Index

2011· paratext· en· W4295932935 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePolicy Press eBooks · 2011
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)MathematicsComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

52 legislative framework 40-5 Montreal Massacre (1989) 44-5 National Action Committee on the Status of Women 38 Native Women's Association of Canada 36 neoliberalism 49 police 37, 38, 39, 41, 46, 52 policy reforms 51, 54 rape 38-9 myths 36-7, 51 stereotypes 37 Rape Crisis centres 47, 52 'rape shield provision' 41-2 restorative justice 46, 52, 54 rights 45, 46, 50 sexual assault 38, 41 sexual offences legislation 8 Statistics Canada 37-8 Assessing Violence Against Women: A Statistical Profile 53 Supreme Court 36-7, 42, 43-4, 45-6, 53

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolicy Press eBooksSame topicSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesFrench-language works237,207