Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assessing Violence Against Women: A Statistical Profile (Statistics Canada) 53 Australia Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault (ACSSA) 13 cases Bull v The Queen (2000) 22-3 Crofts v R (1996) 21 KRM v The Queen (2001) 25 Longman v R (1989) 20 R v BWT (NSW) (2002) 25 Centres Against Sexual Assault (Victoria) 23 court processes 27 Department for Women (NSW): Heroines of Fortitude report 24-5 husbands' immunity 15 judges 26, 27, 29 juries 19, 20, 21, 22-3, 25, 29 legislation Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), (2003 amendment) 18 Crimes Act 1958 (Victoria) 19, 21 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) 21 Evidence (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (1991) 22 Evidence Act (Cth) (NSW) (ACT) (VIC) 26 Sexual and Violent Offences Legislation Amendment Act (2008) 27-8 Sexual Offences (Evidence and Procedure) Act 1983 (Northern Territories) 22 National Council to Reduce Violence Against Women and their Children 13 'objective fault test' (NSW) 20 offenders conviction/acquittal 17 prosecution 16-17, 23-4 sentencing 17-18, 25-6 trials 24-5 B
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.565 | 0.405 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".