Color Doppler imaging of a temporal artery – a new diagnostic tool in giant cell arteritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Wietrzykowska C, Wiącek MP, Krytkowska E, Milchert M, Brzosko M, Machalińska A. Color Doppler imaging of a temporal artery – a new diagnostic tool in giant cell arteritis. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica. 2022. doi:10.5114/ko.2022.113748. APA Wietrzykowska, C., Wiącek, M. P., Krytkowska, E., Milchert, M., Brzosko, M., & Machalińska, A. (2022). Color Doppler imaging of a temporal artery – a new diagnostic tool in giant cell arteritis. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica. https://doi.org/10.5114/ko.2022.113748 Chicago Wietrzykowska, Claudia, Marta P Wiącek, Elżbieta Krytkowska, Marcin Milchert, Marek Brzosko, and Anna Machalińska. 2022. "Color Doppler imaging of a temporal artery – a new diagnostic tool in giant cell arteritis". Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica. doi:10.5114/ko.2022.113748. Harvard Wietrzykowska, C., Wiącek, M., Krytkowska, E., Milchert, M., Brzosko, M., and Machalińska, A. (2022). Color Doppler imaging of a temporal artery – a new diagnostic tool in giant cell arteritis. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica. https://doi.org/10.5114/ko.2022.113748 MLA Wietrzykowska, Claudia et al. "Color Doppler imaging of a temporal artery – a new diagnostic tool in giant cell arteritis." Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica, 2022. doi:10.5114/ko.2022.113748. Vancouver Wietrzykowska C, Wiącek M, Krytkowska E, Milchert M, Brzosko M, Machalińska A. Color Doppler imaging of a temporal artery – a new diagnostic tool in giant cell arteritis. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica. 2022. doi:10.5114/ko.2022.113748.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".