MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introducing Mixed Reality for Clinical Uses

2022· book-chapter· en· W4295941036 on OpenAlexaff
Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana, Paolo Palmisciano, Nicola Montemurro, Gianluca Scalia, Dragan Radovanović, Kevin Cassar, Stefano M. Priola, Igor Končar, Predrag Stevanović, Mario Travali

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in human and social aspects of technology book series · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsNOSM University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineSocial realityPsychologyMedical physicsPathologySociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent of mixed reality (MR) has revolutionized human activities on a daily basis, striving for augmenting professional and social interactions at all levels. In medicine, MR tools have been developed and tested at an increasing rate over the years, playing a promising role in assisting physicians while improving patient care. In this chapter, the authors present their initial experience in introducing different MR algorithms in routine clinical practice from their implementation in several neurosurgical procedures to their use during the COVID-19 pandemic. A general summary of the current literature on MR in medicine has also been reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in human and social aspects of technology book seriesSame topicSurgical Simulation and TrainingFrench-language works237,207