MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295989459 · doi:10.1007/s42438-022-00332-1

Teaching in the Age of Covid-19—The New Normal

2022· article· en· W4295989459 on OpenAlexaff
Petar Jandrić, Ana Fuentes Martínez, Charles Reitz, Liz Jackson, Dennis Grauslund, David L. Hayes, Happiness Onesmo Lukoko, Michael Hogan, Peter Mozelius, Janine Arantes, Paul Levinson, Jānis T. Ozoliņš, James D. Kirylo, Paul R. Carr, Nina Hood, Marek Tesař, Sean Sturm, Sandra Abegglen, Tom Burns, Sandra Sinfield, Georgina Stewart, Juha Suoranta, Jimmy Jaldemark, Ulrika Gustafsson, Lilia D. Monzó, Ivana Batarelo Kokić, Jimmy Ezekiel Kihwele, Jake Wright, Pallavi Kishore, Paul Alexander Stewart, SM Bridges, Mikkel Lodahl, Peter Bryant, Kulpreet Kaur, Stephanie Hollings, James Benedict Brown, Anne Steketee, Paul Prinsloo, Hazzan Moses Kayode, Michael Jopling, Julia Mañero, Andrew Gibbons, Sarah Pfohl, Niklas Humble, Jacob Davidsen, Derek R. Ford, Navreeti Sharma, Kevin Stockbridge, Olli Pyyhtinen, Carlos Escaño, Charlotte Achieng-Evensen, Jennifer Rose, Jones Irwin, Richa Shukla, Suzanne SooHoo, Ian Truelove, Rachel Buchanan, Shreya Urvashi, E. Jayne White, Rene Novak, Thomas Ryberg, Sonja Arndt, Bridgette Redder, Mousumi Mukherjee, Blessing Funmi Komolafe, Madhav Mallya, Nesta Devine, Sahar D. Sattarzadeh, Sarah Hayes

Bibliographic record

VenuePostdigital Science and Education · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Education and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)WorkspaceData collectionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakNew normalComputer scienceMedicineMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsVirologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.011
Scholarly communication0.0110.010
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePostdigital Science and EducationSame topicDigital Education and SocietyFrench-language works237,207